The key to performance improvements is knowing where to focus in training

So we compared 6 races to highlight where the biggest changes are happening: 

How to read the graphs:

  • The dots indicate each individual swimmer: navy blue for 2017, bright blue for 2018
  • The box indicates the range of performances falling between 25% - 75%, while the vertical lines above and below represent the rest of the field. 
  • Red or Grey circles above or below the lines are outliers (e.g. Lilly King, Caeleb Dressel)
  • The line inside each box represents the median
men100free_reptime_dotbox.png

Men's 100 free:

Overall, average race time reduced by 0.06%, however the middle of the field saw a larger 0.61% improvement 

  • The slowest 2018 competitor finished 0.5 s behind slowest in 2017
  • The average Stroke Efficiency across the field rose by 0.2 in 2018
  • Time Underwater decreased 0.1 s on average, with the fastest competitor adding 0.2 s and the slowest dropping 0.3 s
men100back_reptime_dotbox.png

Men's 100 back:

The final race time for the field condensed in 2018, with the fastest competitor finishing 0.6 s later than in 2017, while the slowest finished 0.2 s ahead of the 2017 race

  • Time Underwater saw most change, 2018 being an average 1.6 s longer
  • DPS and Stroke Rate remained stable, while Speed improved slightly, contributing to a more efficient Stroke Index in 2018
men50free_reptime_dotbox.png

Men's 50 free:

While Dressel blew the competition away even further than in 2017, the rest of the field remained very stable, the average time dropping only .4% 

  • Stroke Index range widened by 0.7 in 2018, the bottom dropping 0.3 m and the top gaining 0.4 m
  • in 2017, a 1.2 m DPS was considered a very high outlier, where in 2018, this value falls within the mid-range (25-75th percentile)
women200fly_reptime_dotbox.png

Women's 200 Fly

The field had one significant outlier (Ella Eastin) in 2018, causing the field to widen. The slowest competitor in 2018 finished 0.7 s sooner, and the fastest a whopping 1.4 s earlier. 

  • While DPS remained quite stable, Stroke Rate got 0.2 s/cycle faster on average in 2018
  • Stroke Index saw the largest fluctuation in 2018, dropping .3 on average, and widening the gap between first and last by 0.7

Lets dig a little deeper on two impressive races: 

men100fly_reptime_dotbox.png

Overall, the Men's 100 Fly finished 0.75s faster in 2018, with only 0.6s separating 2nd and 8th, where 2017 had ~2s separating the field

There was significant movement across all metrics year over year, even if we ignore the Dressel factor.

 

Fig 1. Total Time Underwater
Fig 2. Stroke Rate by Split
Fig 3. Average Stroke Counts per Length
men100fly_time_uw_final.png
men100fly_cycle_time.png
men100fly_strokecount_final-with-fly-icon.png
The three most changed metrics from 2017 to 2018 were Time Underwater (Fig. 1), Stroke Rate (Fig. 2), and Stroke Count (Fig. 3). See our analysis of each below. 
Note: there were only 7 finishers in 2017, as Lane 7 was DSQ in the race
  • Time Underwater: 
Underwater Time
  • As shown by the graph of Total Time Underwater (Fig. 1), Time Underwater increased across most of the field
    • More than half of the 2017 competitors went shorter than 18 s total time underwater, while in 2018 everyone remained under for at least 18s
  • The average competitor in 2018 stayed under 8% longer, with the middle 2 competitors just behind average at 7.8%
  • Stroke Rate (Cycle Time): 
Stroke Rate
  • As shown in the graph of Stroke Rate above (Fig. 2), cycle times on average got faster in 2018, with significant changes on the 2nd and last splits
  • The average slowed down by 2.5%, but the middle saw less fluctuation at 1.4%
  • The slowest Stroke Rate slowed by 0.1 s/cycle
  • Stroke Count
Stroke Count Icon
  • In Fig. 3 above, we can see stroke counts decreased for most athletes in 2018
  • Stroke count decreases seem to be related for the most part to time underwater increases
  • Total range of stroke counts in each length decreased since no swimmer averaged more than 6 strokes per length in 2018
  • DPS:

DPS

  • The 2018 field is more condensed, reducing the longest strokes by ~0.2 m and increasing the shortest by 0.4 m
  • 2018 saw one outlier at the front of the field (Dressel), where 2017 had one outlier significantly behind the field
  • Average field dropped 0.1%, but middle increased by 0.3%
  • Stroke Index

Stroke Index

  • Majority of field produced less efficient strokes in 2018
  • Swimmers increased their stroke index, particularly in the first split, where the average Stroke Index increased from 4.5 to 4.9
  • Overall average is up 0.6%, but middle group only up 0.3%

 

Women's 100 Breaststroke

women100breast_reptime_dotbox.png

2018 saw a far more dispersed field overall in the Women's 100 Breaststroke race, with nearly 4 s separating 1st from 8th, but only 1 s separating 2nd from 7th.  

Several metrics saw some shifting year over year in the Women's 100 Breast, while others remained quite similar. Also Lilly King put in a great performance, with many of her individual metrics making noticable moves

 

Fig 1. Total Time Underwater
Fig 2. Stroke Rate by Split
Fig 3. Average Stroke Counts per Length
Womenbreast_timieuw_Final.png
women100breast_cycle_time.png
Women100BR_strokecount.png
The most changed metrics from 2017 to 2018 were Time Underwater (Fig. 1), and Stroke Rate (Fig. 2). See our analysis of each below.
  • Time Underwater:

Underwater Time

  • In Fig. 1 above, we see an almost small average increase in time spent underwater in 2018 (half a second longer)\
  • The longest total Time Underwater rose by 0.6s while the shortest also rose a similar amount, by 0.5s
    • Top four finishers in 2018 held very similar total time underwater near 19 s
  • Stroke Rate (Cycle Time):

Stroke Rate

    • Similar to the Men's 100 fly, stroke rates were slower across all splits, as seen in Fig. 2 above
  • This slow down included Lilly King, whose stroke rates slowed compared to last year
  • Stroke rate changes occurred in the first splits of the race, but the last split remained similar to last year
  • Stroke Count

Stroke Count Icon

  • in Fig. 3 above, we saw no significant shift in stroke counts for most swimmers
  • Lilly King fit almost a full extra stroke into each of her lengths this year compared to her stroke count last year
  • This extra stroke slightly increased the range of stroke counts we saw
  • DPS:

DPS

  • Shortest DPS of the 2018 field pulled 0.1 m longer strokes than in 2017
  • Average competitor lengthened their stroke by 0.6%, where middle 2 competitors shorted by 0.6%
  • Longest DPS saw basically 0 movement year over year 
  • Stroke Index

Stroke Index

  • Overall field relatively stable year over year, with an average increase of 0.2%
  • The middle 2 competitors in 2018 increased their efficiency by 0.2 
  •  The range between the top and bottom performer decreased in 2018 by 0.1

 

Change doesn't happen in races.

Change happens in training.

Get this level of data analysis in training every day, with TritonWear's advanced wearable technology

Master your Data

The Triton Device captures and transmits key metrics in real time, enabling better feedback.

  • A small device tucks in just above the nape of the neck, to collect data on every lap
  • Calculates and transmits 13 metrics, including all mentioned in the analysis above, and more

Perfect your Training 

The TritonWear dashboard enables coaches and athletes to quantify and address findings efficiently.

  • Compare metrics to peers, and professionals 
  • identify and address trends over time 

Conquer your Competition

With optimized individual training, practice is more efficient and fun, and competitions see better results.

  • Improve race outcomes
  • Reduce training injury
  • Increase athlete retention and engagement

 

home-page-product-shot.png
Trusted by top NCAA Coaches:

Don't get left behind, find out how you can benefit from TritonWear today.

Download

Catch up to your competitors, reach out for your no obligation quote right now!

Let's Chat